This article is an exploration of the advanced features of the programming language Nim, using the example of implementing YAML serialization. I will show why Nim’s advanced metaprogramming facilities are useful and how some of them are employed. Prior knowledge about Nim and YAML definitely makes reading this post easier, but I will go over the very basics in case you don’t.
You may have already heard of it. It is a data serialization languages that builds upon JSON but is nicer for human being to read and write (mostly). So, if you have some JSON data like this:
Your YAML looks like this:
Now before you think too much about what this data might represent, let’s move on to the programming language we will use.
Nim is a statically typed, garbage collected language that compiles to C (or various other backends). It uses indentation for structure (like Python) and tries not to hinder your hacking habits by requiring you to verbosely specify type names everywhere.
Most of the Nim code shown here is easy to understand if you have seen code before. I will explain the tricky things.
So, what we want to do now is implementing automatic type serialization and deserialization with Nim and YAML. That is to say, we want to be able to dump any Nim type into a YAML representation, and we also want to be able to reload that YAML representation back into Nim. This should work without modifying the type, so we can serialize types of a third-party library we happen to use.
As a prerequisite, we will use a YAML parser and presenter which already exists
by magic. Actually, it is a project called NimYAML, you can git-clone it from
the repository. At the time of writing, there was a little API break after
the most recent release, so if you actually want to test the code, use the
devel branch from the repo.
So, how do the values we want to serialize look like? Let’s have a look:
Here, we have some simple things to start with: A string named
i and a complex object named
What we want to do is this:
So, how do we start? Let’s just write the
First thing to notice that our proc (called function in some other languages)
has a generic parameter
T. That is to say, the parameter
o has a
generic type. We can call this function with a value of any type as long as
everything we do with this value is supported by the type.
When serializing, we transform our value into a stream of events. These events will then be transformed into YAML by the presenter. The stream always starts with a document start event, which we put into the stream, and a document end event, which we also put into the stream.
Finally, we call
present, which takes our event stream and transforms it into
serializationTagLibrary is a value supplied by NimYAML and does not
need to be of concern for us right now.
So, with this, almost everything we need to do has been done, right? Well, yes,
except of the
represent part. This is the everything you do with this value
I talked about above. We need to implement
represent for all types
we want to dump. Let’s start with three simple types:
Well that was easy! The only thing we need to do for each simple value is to
create a scalar event which has as content a textual representation of our
value. We use the handy
$ operator here, which transforms our
bool value into strings.
Now comes the interesting part: How can we serialize an arbitrary object? Here, Nim’s metaprogramming capabilities are a big help:
First thing to notice is that we once again have a generic proc. But this time,
the generic parameter
T is constrained: It only takes types that are an
Since an object is a complex value, we use a YAML mapping (also known as
hash map or dictionary in other languages) to hold all its values. We start
and end it with a start map event and an end map event respectively. Now
comes the interesting part:
fieldPairs is a special iterator that iterates
over fields of an object. While this may be common in scripting languages like
Java, for example, has its reflection API to do this at runtime, but this has
severe consequences: You suddenly lose all type safety and operate on raw
Object values, which you cast around. It also means that the runtime must
provide type information, so the code can get a list of fields for a certain
class type. Nim goes a different way:
for loop is expanded at compile time. So we do not need to carry over
any type information into the runtime environment. This means that we can write
generic code that works on any object type, no matter how many fields it
contains and what types they have. It also means that we can have complete type
safety because the code is expanded at compile time and then interpreted for
every typed field of the object separately.
So, what do we do in this loop? First, we create a scalar event which holds the name of the field. This will be a key in our YAML mapping. The value for this key is the represented value of the field. This is just a recursive call. With this code, we have written everything necessary to serialize all objects that contain strings, ints, bools or other objects with the same restrictions.
If we execute our three calls from the beginning now:
That wasn’t too hard, was it? But, all this dumping would be of little help if we couldn’t also load the data back in, right? So…
Let’s load it! We start as before:
Once again, we define a generic proc to handle any possible type. Note that the
variable we want to load is a
var parameter rather than a return value (a
parameter is passed by reference). This enables us to later call the
without explicitly giving the generic type parameter.
We create a parser object with the same
serializationTagLibrary we used before
(remember?) which is still not of any concern. Then, we tell the parser to
generate an event stream by parsing our input.
Remember how we generated two events that start and end our YAML document? Now
next() on the event stream, which will each time yield the next event,
and check whether the first and last event are of kind document start and
document end respectively. So far, so good. As before, we then call a
construct proc which needs to be implemented for every type we want to load.
Let us implement it for the simple types:
For each of the simple types, we first retrieve the the event that hopefully contains our value and check if it actually is a scalar item. Then, we parse it into the target type. This is trivial for a string, and easy enough for an int (using a stdlib feature) and a boolean (which could use stricter checking).
Now that we have these, let us write our loader for object types:
Our object must start with a start map event and end with an end map event,
which is checked by the
doAssert and the while loop condition respectively.
For every key-value pair in the map, we check that the key is a scalar and
search for a field of the object with the same name. If we find one, we then
construct the value of this field from the event stream.
Of course, we should check whether the name actually matched any of the field names, but this is left as an exercise to the reader. We could also ensure that every field is matched, which is an excellent second exercise for the reader. And finally, we could check for duplicates, which is, you guessed it, the third exercise.
That’s it! Let’s test it:
We have just implemented a generic serializer for a statically typed programming language in less than 100 lines of code. Isn’t that awesome! Compare that to the amount of Java code you need to serialize objects to XML given the standard Java XML API.
Well, the actual serialization API implementation of NimYAML is, of course, a bit bigger (about 1000 lines of code) because it handles far more cases, including reference types (garbage-collected pointers), sequences (lists) and various other types which need special treatment. But you get my point: I do not want to write this in a language that makes it difficult to handle arbitrarily defined object types. And I also do not want to give up on static typing. So Nim seems to be the right language to use for me.
What I have shown here also is just the tip of the iceberg. You can do far more
complex things with
macros in Nim than what I did with
actual serialization implementation uses macros instead of
handling objects because they are more flexible.
Well, that’s it! Thanks for reading.